RAKESH SINHA’S FIRE FACTS ON BABRI-RAM MANDIR ISSUE MAKES MUSLIM LEADER LEAVE THE SHOW

5495

In 2003, the ASI (Archaeological Survey Of India) did a survey to determine whether a temple existed on the disputed site of Ayodhya. The reports proved that a 12th-century Hindu temple existed there. Several animal figurines and other materials dating back to the 12th century highlighting the existence of a temple prove that the claim of Babri Masjid in that place is incorrect.

source

Ayodhya is the birthplace of Lord Ram, one of the greatest gods of the Hindus. A mosque, built at the holy site will probably hurt their religious sentiments. What happened on 6 December 1992 was an eruption of years and years of silence and forbearance of the Hindus over the issue.

But who knew that this very incident will give the opposition, the minorities, the leaders of different parties a lifetime opportunity to target the BJP. Well, it is happening indeed and that too openly. Look very closely and you will see how in the name of ‘trying to solve the dispute‘, the opposition and the minority are playing the political play, influencing people without them knowing, getting the judiciary to take decisions in their favour, and stretching the most sensitive issue of the Indian history like a rubber band. All this, because of the dreams they nurture of getting the entire population to lose trust in the ruling and the blazing BJP.

The supreme court today revived the 25-year-old trial in the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid dispute by allowing fresh charges against BJP leaders L.K. Advani, Murli Manohar Joshi, Uma Bharti and 10 others.

Opposition and minorities seem to be very happy with this news. Well, they have a lot to say when they are backed by a crowd. But they cannot just withstand the fire facts alone.

Charges are being allowed at BJP’s top leaders, calling it all a ‘conspiracy’ by them. All this despite the fact that the ruling party has always kept everything transparent. But no one ever filed a case against Mulayam Singh Yadav who had ordered firing on karsevaks in 1990, just to keep his Muslim vote bank safe and brimming. No one even objected when the SP supremo publicly stated that he wouldn’t have regretted killing more of them (kar sevaks).

And when it comes to the Muslim population and their leaders, it seems like they have sworn to do and demonstrate just the opposite of the right wing. They present incomplete truth, irrelevant logics, and when they can’t stand the facts, they leave.

See what happened in the show. What did Rakesh Sinha say that made Zafar Jilani almost leave and become a nervous wreck there after…

The data CBI today has, was presented to it by the opposition again. Could that be trusted? Could not that be a conspiracy against BJP leaders who are made to face the charges today? It could be, but no one will object.

Think once, Even as the Babri Masjid on a disputed site in Ayodhya was demolished in 1992, the incident was not something that took place at the spur of the moment. Instead, the demolition of the mosque was the ‘ultimate outburst’ of hundreds of years of conflict that started with the construction of the mosque on the instruction of then Mughal Emperor Babar in 1528. But would this be taken into consideration? We’are afraid NOT!

Loading...
Loading...